Science News logo

Science Service logo


Deadly Bubble Bath: Ultrasound fizz kills microbes under pressure

Peter Weiss

Bubbles can be microbe killers. Scientists have long known that ultrasound in liquids causes gas bubbles to form and then often collapse violently. When those bubbles implode in cleaning solutions, they break up dirt and destroy some microbes. Doctors have eyed high-frequency sound as a quick, low-heat way to sterilize medical instruments, but no ultrasonic device yet has killed germs efficiently enough.

A study unveiled this week at the First Pan-American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics in Cancun, Mexico, suggests that an effect known from submarine research may make ultrasound sterilization possible. In a liquid exposed to ultrasound, moderately increasing the pressure dramatically boosts microbe destruction, according to Kenneth A. Cunefare of the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta and his colleagues.

In related microbe-blasting research presented at the Cancun meeting, Mexican scientists described work using powerful electric discharges in water to produce shock waves. Achim M. Loske of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México in Querétaro and his colleagues found that the pressure, bursting bubbles, and light from the discharges combine to slay bacteria in complex ways.

Loske's group also found that ultrasound-induced bubble formation, or cavitation, and bursting might not affect different bacteria in the same way. Boosting the number of cavitation bubbles increased the kill of one pathogenic bacterium, Escherichia coli, but not of a Listeria strain.

In a liquid, bubbles form when falling pressure permits dissolved gases to pop out of solution. A churning submarine propeller or the low-pressure phase of a sound wave can create such cavitation. When the pressure jumps back up, the bubbles violently collapse (SN: 8/24/02, p. 125).

In previous work, scientists studying damage to submarine propellers from such implosions found that bubbles formed at moderate pressure, at shallow depths, do the most harm. Initially, as depth and pressure increase, the bubbles implode with much more force. At greater depths, however, the pressure becomes too high for bubbles to form at all.

In the Georgia team's experiments, the researchers tested the impact of the disinfectant isopropyl alcohol on bacteria and bacterial spores when combined with ultrasound. In tests of a 66 percent alcohol solution on spores of harmless Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus stearothermophilus, ultrasound had a negligible effect at atmospheric pressure, even after 20 minutes, says Stephen D. Carter, a Snellville, Ga., dentist who worked with Cunefare on the study.

However, doubling the pressure caused 90 percent of the spores to die in just 1 minute. For the effect to be considered sterilization, however, the concentration of surviving microbes must drop to 1 in a million or less, he notes.

Acoustics specialists have failed for decades to achieve ultrasonic sterilization, comments Lawrence A. Crum of the University of Washington in Seattle. That's because creating an implosion near every microbe is a tall order, he says.

The Georgia team plans to circulate the fluid to meet that challenge. If the technique works, Carter predicts that it could achieve sterilization in 10 minutes—a third of the time required by an automated system that washes instruments with peracetic acid, the leading low-temperature sterilization method now in use.

********

References:

Cunefare, K.A. 2002. Enhancement of the biocidal efficacy of a mild disinfectant through enhanced transient cavitation. First Pan-American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics. Dec. 5. Cancun, Mexico. Abstract.

Loske, A.M. 2002. Lithotripter shock wave interaction with bacteria. First Pan-American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics. Dec. 4. Cancun, Mexico. Abstract available at Abstract.

Further Readings:

Weiss, P. 2002. Violent chemistry saps sonobubble energy. Science News 162(Aug. 24):125–126. Available at Science News.

Sources:

Stephen D. Carter
Family Dentistry
1608 Tree Lane
Building B, Suite 203
Snellville, GA 30078

Lawrence A. Crum
Applied Physics Laboratory
University of Washington
1013 NE 40th Street
Box 355640
Seattle, WA 98105-6698

Kenneth A. Cunefare
Georgia Institute of Technology
George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineeering
113 MRDC II, Love Building
Atlanta, GA 30332-0405

Achim M. Loske
Centro de Física Aplicada y Technología Avanzada
UNAM. A.P. 1-1010
Querétaro, Qro. 76000
Mexico


From Science News, Volume 162, No. 23, December 7, 2002, p. 358.